ANALISIS NORMATIF PUTUSAN HAKIM TENTANG PEMBERIAN  IDDAH DAN MUT’AH SEBELUM IKRAR TALAK

Itsna Faiqatul Himmah

Itsna Faiqatul Himmah Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Ponorogo

Keywords: Application of Fiqh khiyâr, Gelangkulon Village, Order System.

Abstract

The consequences of breaking up a marriage are regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Chapter XVII Article 149 Compilation of Islamic Law, post-divorce maintenance is carried out after the pronouncement of the divorce vow, what is meant by the breakup of the marriage is after the divorce has occurred, in which divorce is considered valid if the arrangement for the divorce pledge is carried out in front of the judges. The provision of Iddah and Mut'ah in the Compilation of Islamic Law and Legislation is not explained precisely when it should be given. Still, in the Decision of the Ponorogo Religious Court Number 1978/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.po, its ruling states that providing iddah and mutah Mut'ah is given to the wife before pronouncing the divorce vow. This study aims to answer questions (a) What is the legal basis for the judges of the Ponorogo Religious Court in deciding Case Number 1978/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.po concerning the provision of iddah and mut'ah maintenance before pronouncing the divorce pledge? (b) What is the juridical implicit of the provision of iddah and mut'ah maintenance before the pronouncement of the divorce pledge in Case Decision Number 1978/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.po at the Ponorogo Religious Court? This field research using a qualitative approach shows that (a) in deciding case Number 1978/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.po the judge prioritized PERMA Number 3 of 2017, because it is more responsive to women and can protect women's rights post- divorce (b) The Juridical Implications of Decision Number 1978/Pdt.g/2021/Pa.po is by the Compilation of Islamic Law Article 131 letter c, the Petitioner is given a deadline of 6 months and if the Applicant is unable to fulfill the iddah and mut'ah maintenance payments, then the implementation of the pronouncement of the divorce vow cannot be carried out (aborted), the Petitioner and the Respondent will remain legally husband and wife because they are considered not serious about carrying out a divorce.

References

Abidin, Slamet. Fiqh Munakahat 1. 1 ed. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 1999.
Agama, Departemen. Ilmu Fiqh Jilid II. Jakarta: Direktoran Jenderal Pembinaan
Kelembagaan Agama Islam, 1985.
Arto, A. Mukti. Praktek perkara perdata pada pengadilan agama. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Pelajar, 1996.
Azizah, Linda. “Analisis Perceraian dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Al-’Adalah 10,
no. 2 (2012): 415–22. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v10i2.295.
Ghofar, Abdul. Fikih Keluarga. Jakarta Timur, t.t.
Haji, Tihami, M.A., dan Sohari Sahrani. Fikih munakahat : kajian fikih nikah lengkap.
Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2009.
jumaidi. Dasar dan Teknik Pembentukan Perundang-undangan. Depok: Tiran Smart,
2019.
Khalid. Ilmu Perundang Undangan. Medan: CV. Pustaka Setia, 2011.
Muzammil, Iffah. FIQH MUNAKAHAT (Hukum Pernikahan dalam Islam). Tangerang:
Tira Smart, 2019.
Redi, Ahmad. Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Jakarta: Sinar
Grafika, 2018.
Saebani, Beni Ahmad, dan Syamsul Falah. Hukum perdata Islam di Indonesia. Cet. 1.
Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2011.
Syukur, Sarmin. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Bangil: Jaudar Press,
2017.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011
Kompilasi Hukum Islam
SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2018.
Tim Hukumonline, “Talak: Pengertian, Dasar Hukum, Syarat, dan Cara
Mengajukannya,” dalam https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/talak-
pengertian-dasar-hukum-syarat-dan-cara-mengajukannya-
lt616e28237e7dc, (diakses pada tanggal 4 April 2022, jam 10.02).